Popular Posts

Showing posts with label Mumbai Blasts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mumbai Blasts. Show all posts

Monday, December 8, 2008

Mumbai blasts - What needs to be done!!

We need to act and we need to do it now….here are a few pointers

Mumbai city, and its people, have been held hostage by 'militants'. This is a clear indication that we are on the global terror map. This was NOT a gang war. The whole reaction from the state and central machinery was slow. Now when we talk of steps to be taken there are a lot changes required on many fronts.

Our leaders need to resign
I am not all upset that the chief minister Vilasrao Deshmukh has been asked to resign. Shivraj Patil should never have been made the union home minister in the first place. Just as you need an able and responsible police director general and commissioner, we need an equally responsible and able home minister.

We want new leaders who will NOT just announce new plans. We want a timeframe within which we will see a new NSG formation, funds for security, funds to improve the lives of the police, whose morale is below zero. The state should improve training for Anti-Terrorist Squads, and new security agencies. They will procure on an immediate basis new guns, ammunition and weapons that will help our police force. Our poor baton-wielding constables have played a major role in foiling the plans of these hardcore militants. We lost 14 constables in this attack. The constables only had wooden batons. But let me tell you, the captured militant has admitted that they could not believe that even a constable chased them to bust their operations. I salute these heroes who were committed to their jobs and lost their lives so that the city could rest peacefully.

Accept that we are on the global 'terror' map
The minute we realise that foreign militants are using Indian turf for terror, we will be able to plan and activate various agencies from the village level to national. We will be able to get a holistic picture of international militancy. Many great scholars ridicule readers who love espionage and thrillers. But one reason I keep reading them is to get a perspective on global militancy. The way their minds work, the way they operate, from local to international networking.

Now when I heard that the Jewish couple was held hostage, it was a natural instinct for me to understand this is something larger than what the government authorities are saying. This was NOT an attack. This was a full-fledged militant war.

Activate ground workers, Khabris
You may ask how khabris can help in the war of terror? Well the fact that these militants ordered 200kg mutton from the local butcher in Colaba, who expressed shock, is a vital clue. This incident would never have gone unreported had our khabris been a part of the Anti-Terrorist Squad network or even part of the local police network. Let us not forget the 1992 riots, and the 1993 blasts that isolated many minority groups, especially Muslims. Most butchers are Muslims. The fact is had the informer network been active this information would have helped the police.

Security must be beefed up along our coast
In 1993, after Mumbai city was rocked by RDX bomb blasts, it was noted that how, due to poor coastal security, all the RDX came from across the border to the Raigadh and Konkan coast. Have we learnt from our mistakes? No. But if the PM or president is in town every helicopter is used to protect them. This should be stopped.

Instead we should have more regular air surveillance can spot suspicious movement along the coast. We need a more alert tourist police. Not those who drink at night and come along pushing a baton into people's stomachs, but those who check identification papers, and keep constant vigil.
We need a pro-active Coast Guard. This time round there were NO coast guard boats at the Yellow Gate when it was reported that few militants had landed using ferries from Porbunder. Three days prior to the attack, fisher folk had held protests on the seafront near Bandra. Our so-called alert Coast Guard had taken their boats there for vigilance.

A source in the CG admitted that the officers did not call back the boats, instead they let them remain at Bandra. This lapse has proved very dear to us. We can't afford such lackadaisical approach when we have a huge coastline.

We need more non-corrupt and efficient navy that doesn't simply use the Mumbai's ports to anchor their ships. We need khabris within the dockyard workers, staff and naval police, who will alert the navy. We need the navy to do its job with as much commitment as our local police have done in the last 60 hours.

Respond like the armed forces
Once we treat this issue like an insurgency we need to tackle and respond like armed forces. This whole combat operation that took place on Friday should have taken place on Thursday itself. The government and security agencies could have taken the hotel management into confidence, asked them of their preparedness for blowing up the building in order to kill the militants. The US armed forces deal the problem of militancy at their level. They utilise police in the city for local operations, maintaining law and order, however, the real operations are handled by top bosses in the US army. They attack at the ground level; they give a specific time for the exchange of fire but do not lose time finishing off the militants. They accept full responsibility for the civilians killed.

Instil fear in the minds of insurgents and militants
We looked as if the whole country was scared and so was our government. We need to study other countries. They talk tough; their body language is serious. The leaders of most countries do not look like they have stepped out of their beds, like ours did. We were completely at sea for 60 hours. We need to instil fear in the minds of the militants.

They need to realise Indians aren't soft. To the world we look like soft targets, which we are, let's accept that. Our leaders, negotiators and NSG or army need to talk tough. They must realise we are serious about dealing with this issue of terror war.

Electronic media needs to mature
Our electronic media is in its infancy. Yes, of course if we send young little reporters who have NO experience to cover a war situation they will treat it like common local crime. It was shoddy reporting. Anchors, who have sadly become icons and idols for wannabe reporters, conducted dramas and soap operas at the scenes where military operations were going on. They revealed the locations of the armed forces, the NSG, their movements and screamed out how these operations have gone wrong. This wasn't an ordinary situation; it wasn't local crime. I expected lot more mature reporting. We should have seen how the foreign media sent its experts - who by the way were oldies with grey hair. But the fact that you need experienced hands, who know the city well, the issue well, and who have experience in covering such disasters. Our reporters don't seem mature at all. The government should have blacked out the news channels right at the beginning.

Public needs to be more mature
The onus of a disciplined nation lies on us citizens. We are a very political race, Asians and Indians. However we lack manners and maturity. The government had asked its people to sit at home. So many revelled at home, had their drinks and holiday snooze.

Later they came out on to the streets. Bystanders, passersby, and absolutely lukkhas whiled away their time laughing at the media and wanting to see the attacks. The police totally failed in controlling the crowds. They in fact pushed the media behind a cordon, screamed and shouted at us. While they allowed the crowds to pile up near the places where combat operations were going on. People came with their pets, toddlers, infants and couples who took time out to romance near these three places. Mumbai has shown complete disrespect to those who fought for us and gave up their lives. People had too much curiosity and breached all norms and rules of civil society. Their children were shooting pictures with flashes -this was all within the one kilometre of the attacks!

People had come to 'see' and inspect these three spots. We are a nation that simply doesn't realise someone else's problem is one's own problem. Till we don't get affected the middle class is NOT concerned at all. We treat it casually and in an immature manner. We have to realise this is regarding our national security, coming to the sites and laughing, clapping, and treating it like a tamasha is a breach of our security, and shows disrespect to the hostages and our forces. We need to see footage of 9/11 to see how their citizens behaved and how they helped, rather than treat these incidents as a joke.

Tuesday, December 2, 2008

Live repoting!! - Banned??

"Several foreign nationals are trapped in the Taj Hotel Mahal"

"The top management of a multinational corporation was meeting…"

"Terrorists are suspected to be on the 9th floor…"

"NSG troops are about to have arrived in Mumbai…"

"NSG commandos have entered the Hotel…"

The above is just some of the information telecast live by all news channels on last week's terror attack on Bombay.

News channels have an objective—to fetch the latest news and share them with viewers, much before a competitor channel does that. But I feel this habit of indiscriminate live reporting, while a combat operation is in progress, can be catastrophic for the success of the military operations against terror.

Let us just think for a while. Do we really need to know everything on a ‘as soon as it happens’ basis? I feel not. Whether NSG commandos have just arrived at airport, or have entered the hotel or are on the first floor or second at this moment, is not necessary to be revealed to the general public on a realtime basis.

Showing such news live, will be immensely useful only to terrorists and their supporters outside.

Consider this. The commandos only know that the militants are somewhere inside the hotel, but the militants know everything about the movements and positions of their pursuers through TV.

Like:

  • Who is on their trail (Army/ NSG/ local police, etc)
  • What is their ETA (estimated time of arrival), which tells them, how much time they have before a gun battle would begin)
  • Where they are right now, at the main entrance/ just entered their floor
  • How is the world responding? Is there pressure mounting on the government to succumb to the demands of terrorists to get the hostages freed (so that they can act tough during negotiation)?
  • How many of their friends are alive or dead (so that they can assess their strength)?
  • What has been the impact of their strike-how many police and civilian dead, the current morale of police, who all as been detained/suspected?
  • Live visuals of the street-to assess a possible escape strategy
  • What information about them the outside world has (which floor they are in, their head count etc. And much more…

In my view, all this information, while useful to viewers and relatives of victims, also helps the terrorists/ militants to consolidate their position and pose a greater challenge to commandos trying to hunt them down and/ or rescue the hostages.

Why is our media helping them by airing live all the sensitive information about the anti terror operations?

The common man does not need to know them on a live basis.

Can’t the information & broadcasting ministry think of banning live reporting during a hostage crisis? Let the channels air the news with a delay of few hours, so that the police and security agencies will have a lead time of few hours, wherein terrorists would be as equally uninformed as they are.

Please note that I am not advocating censorship. I am all for free speech and expression. What I am proposing, is that security agencies should have the power to impose a delay of say three to six hours w.r.t live reporting of anti-terror operations.

Let the TV channels record whatever they want, but they should be aired only after a gap of few hours. I do not think anyone loses anything with this.

The movie A Wednesday also shares same opinion.I feel the good old days of once in a day news bulletin was far better.

What do you think?